Defensible vendor decisions - without the spreadsheet drift.
A structured evaluation workspace for vendor selection, RFP scoring, and high-stakes procurement decisions. Bring transparency, consensus, and a defensible audit trail to decisions that today happen in scattered spreadsheets and email threads.

High-stakes decisions deserve more than email threads.

When vendor scores, rationale, and approvals scatter across files and inboxes, every decision gets harder to defend.
- ProblemCriteria live in one spreadsheet, scores in another, and the final pick gets made in a meeting nobody can reconstruct.
- ProblemEvaluators score on different scales, with different weights, and someone manually reconciles it the night before the recommendation is due.
- ProblemCompliance and audit ask “why this vendor?” six months later - and nobody can answer.
- ProblemThe losing vendor escalates, and there’s no clean trail showing how the decision was made.
Bring transparency, consensus, and audit-readiness to every decision.
Outcome-focused capabilities. Request a walkthrough on a real evaluation for the specifics.
Structured evaluation framework
A consistent template across categories so every evaluation is comparable - and onboarding new evaluators takes minutes.
Weighted multi-evaluator scoring
Configurable criteria and weights, with each evaluator scoring independently before consensus.
Consensus and variance analytics
See where evaluators agree, where they don’t, and where to spend the conversation.
Exportable scorecards & reports
Board-ready exports, audit-ready exports, vendor-debrief-ready exports - one click each.
Audit-ready decision records
Every score, weight change, comment, and approval - captured as a defensible record.
Permissions that match the room
Evaluators, observers, approvers, auditors - each sees exactly what they should.
See the decision the way the committee sees it.
Side-by-side weighted scores, evaluator consensus, and the lines of thinking behind each criterion.
- Vendor A4.64.24.13.94.26
- Vendor B4.24.43.84.04.13
- Vendor C3.73.94.54.44.05
- Vendor D3.43.63.54.33.65
- Vendor ATotal4.26
- Fit
- 4.6
- Security
- 4.2
- Roadmap
- 4.1
- Total cost
- 3.9
- Vendor BTotal4.13
- Fit
- 4.2
- Security
- 4.4
- Roadmap
- 3.8
- Total cost
- 4.0
- Vendor CTotal4.05
- Fit
- 3.7
- Security
- 3.9
- Roadmap
- 4.5
- Total cost
- 4.4
- Vendor DTotal3.65
- Fit
- 3.4
- Security
- 3.6
- Roadmap
- 3.5
- Total cost
- 4.3
- Weighted scoring across criteria you define.
- Evaluator consensus and variance at a glance.
- Drill into any score for the reasoning behind it.
- Export an audit-ready record of the full decision.
Optional AI assistance for faster, cleaner decisions.
For customers who want them, AI services can help draft evaluation criteria, summarize vendor responses, surface themes, and highlight scoring inconsistencies. Guardrails keep AI in an advisory role: evaluators and approvers remain in control, and every accepted recommendation stays tied to the decision record.
Built for the people who own the call.
Run a structured RFP without herding spreadsheets.
Get on the same page faster, with the trail to show for it.
Choose vendors and partners with a defensible record.
A complete decision record, available on demand.
Bring us your hardest decision.
We’ll walk you through the platform on a real evaluation - your criteria, your evaluators, your vendors.
